To get updates on new site content, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

Difference between revisions of "Draft:Animal Rights"

From JFA Wiki
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
{{jfa-note}}
 
{{jfa-note}}
This article as been assigned to [[User:Greg.Fuller]] and will be moved to from the draft namespace to the main namespace when completed.
+
This draft as been assigned to [[User:Greg.Fuller]] and will be moved to from the draft namespace to the main namespace when completed.
 
{{jfa-note-end}}
 
{{jfa-note-end}}
  

Revision as of 10:51, 2 October 2019


This draft as been assigned to User:Greg.Fuller and will be moved to from the draft namespace to the main namespace when completed.

Introduction

The term animal rights is usually employed in the general sense to convey the idea that non-human animals are worthy of a high degree of moral consideration. It can also used more specifically to refer to a rights-based philosophical approach as opposed to other philosophical frameworks. Additionally, animal rights can refer to a legal concept, but that is outside the scope of this article.

In this article, we use the term in the general sense but in a philosophical context, covering:

  • how animal rights philosophy contextually fits into the overall areas of philosophy
  • the philosophical approaches to animal ethics
  • the major philosophers who shaped the landscape
  • the usefulness of animal rights philosophy in advocacy and outreach.

Context

See Also

Footnotes


Meta

This article was originally authored by Greg Fuller. The contents may have been edited since that time by others.