To get updates on new site content, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

Difference between revisions of "Draft:Animal Rights"

From JFA Wiki
(Philosophers)
(Philosophers)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
{{jfa-note}}
 
{{jfa-note}}
This draft as been assigned to [[User:Greg.Fuller]] and will be moved to from the draft namespace to the main namespace when completed.
+
This draft as been assigned to [[User:Greg.Fuller]] and will be moved from the draft namespace to the main namespace when completed.
 
{{jfa-note-end}}
 
{{jfa-note-end}}
  
 
== Introduction ==
 
== Introduction ==
  
The term ''animal rights'' is usually employed in the general sense to convey the idea that non-human animals are worthy of a high degree of moral consideration. It can also used more specifically to refer to a rights-based philosophical approach as opposed to other philosophical frameworks. Additionally, ''animal rights'' can refer to a legal concept, but that is outside the scope of this article.
+
The term ''animal rights'' is ordinarily used to convey the idea that non-human animals are worthy of a high degree of moral consideration. It can also be used more specifically to refer to a rights-based philosophical approach to animal ethics as opposed to other philosophical frameworks. Additionally, ''animal rights'' can refer to a legal concept, but that is outside the scope of this article.
  
 
In this article, we use the term in the general sense but in a philosophical context, covering:
 
In this article, we use the term in the general sense but in a philosophical context, covering:
  
* how animal rights philosophy contextually fits into the overall areas of philosophy
+
* How animal rights philosophy contextually fits into the overall areas of philosophy
* the philosophical approaches to animal ethics
+
* The philosophical approaches to animal ethics
* the major philosophers who shaped the landscape
+
* The major philosophers who shaped the landscape
* objections to animal rights philosophy
+
* Objections to animal rights philosophy
* the usefulness of animal rights philosophy in advocacy and outreach.
+
* The usefulness of animal rights philosophy in advocacy and outreach
  
 
== Context ==
 
== Context ==
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
=== Utilitarianism ===
 
=== Utilitarianism ===
 +
 +
=== Negative Utilitarianism ===
  
 
=== Rights Based, Deontological ===
 
=== Rights Based, Deontological ===
Line 29: Line 31:
 
== Philosophers ==
 
== Philosophers ==
  
=== Pythagoras ===
+
=== Pythagoras (570 BCE–490 BCE) ===
 +
 
 +
=== René Descartes (1596–1650) ===
  
=== René Descartes ===
+
=== Samuel Johnson (1709–1784) ===
  
=== Jean-Jacques Rousseau ===
+
=== Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778) ===
  
=== Jeremy Bentham ===
+
=== Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) ===
  
=== Arthur Schopenhauer ===
+
=== Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860) ===
  
=== Richard Ryder ===
+
=== Tom Regan (1938–2017) ===
  
=== Peter Singer ===
+
=== Richard Ryder (1940– ) ===
  
=== James Rachels ===
+
=== James Rachels (1941–2003) ===
  
=== Tom Regan ===
+
=== Peter Singer (1946– ) ===
  
 
== Objections to Animal Rights Philosophy ==
 
== Objections to Animal Rights Philosophy ==

Latest revision as of 11:02, 15 January 2020


This draft as been assigned to User:Greg.Fuller and will be moved from the draft namespace to the main namespace when completed.

Introduction

The term animal rights is ordinarily used to convey the idea that non-human animals are worthy of a high degree of moral consideration. It can also be used more specifically to refer to a rights-based philosophical approach to animal ethics as opposed to other philosophical frameworks. Additionally, animal rights can refer to a legal concept, but that is outside the scope of this article.

In this article, we use the term in the general sense but in a philosophical context, covering:

  • How animal rights philosophy contextually fits into the overall areas of philosophy
  • The philosophical approaches to animal ethics
  • The major philosophers who shaped the landscape
  • Objections to animal rights philosophy
  • The usefulness of animal rights philosophy in advocacy and outreach

Context

Approaches

Utilitarianism

Negative Utilitarianism

Rights Based, Deontological

Virtue Ethics

Philosophers

Pythagoras (570 BCE–490 BCE)

René Descartes (1596–1650)

Samuel Johnson (1709–1784)

Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778)

Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832)

Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860)

Tom Regan (1938–2017)

Richard Ryder (1940– )

James Rachels (1941–2003)

Peter Singer (1946– )

Objections to Animal Rights Philosophy

Usefulness for Advocacy and Outreach

See Also

Footnotes


Meta

This article was originally authored by Greg Fuller. The contents may have been edited since that time by others.