To get updates on new site content, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

Difference between revisions of "Regenerative Grazing"

From JFA Wiki
(Facts)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
* A study led by Oxford and published by the Food Climate Research Group (FCRN) disputed the claims made for regenerative grazing, saying "The actual evidence is thin on the ground and contradictory." https://www.fcrn.org.uk/sites/default/files/project-files/fcrn_gnc_report.pdf
 
* A study led by Oxford and published by the Food Climate Research Group (FCRN) disputed the claims made for regenerative grazing, saying "The actual evidence is thin on the ground and contradictory." https://www.fcrn.org.uk/sites/default/files/project-files/fcrn_gnc_report.pdf
 
* This is just to text key words inside a paragraph, like Context, Facts, and Secondary Sources.
 
  
 
* A review published in the Agricultural Systems concludes that "the vast majority of experimental evidence does not support claims of enhanced ecological benefits in IRG compared to other grazing strategies, including the capacity to increase storage of soil organic carbon." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.001
 
* A review published in the Agricultural Systems concludes that "the vast majority of experimental evidence does not support claims of enhanced ecological benefits in IRG compared to other grazing strategies, including the capacity to increase storage of soil organic carbon." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.001

Revision as of 20:49, 10 February 2019

Template:Jfa-maintext

Context

  • In a Ted Talk in 2013, Alan Savory presented his view that regenerative grazing and holistic management is a way to reverse climate change and desertification. The talk went viral with 2.7 million views. https://youtu.be/vpTHi7O66pI

Facts

  • A paper published in the International Journal of Biodiversity in 2014 titled "Holistic Management: Misinformation on the Science of Grazed Ecosystems" examined 5 claims of Holistic Management. None of the claims held up to scientific scrutiny and each claim was associated with a destructive, not beneficial as claimed, impact on the environment. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/163431
  • A review published in the Agricultural Systems concludes that "the vast majority of experimental evidence does not support claims of enhanced ecological benefits in IRG compared to other grazing strategies, including the capacity to increase storage of soil organic carbon." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.001

Secondary Sources

  • According to George Monbiot, "There was a major study conducted, reviewing 300 papers on this subject, to see whether his claims, such as his holistic ranching could suck all the industrial carbon out of the atmosphere, whether that stood up. They found there is simply no evidence for such claims at all, that they are wildly wrong. And unfortunately, those claims, because they’re highly attractive to people, because they create the impression that you can eat meat and save the world, are simply not based on fact." https://www.democracynow.org/2018/11/29/george_monbiot_ending_meat_dairy_consumption

Template:Jfa-maintext-end

Meta

This fact sheet was originally authored by Greg Fuller. The contents may have been edited since that time by others.

Plain Text

See Also