Difference between revisions of "Regenerative Grazing"
Greg.Fuller (talk | contribs) (Created page with "For Fact Sheet: Grazing in general, and Alan Savory's regenerative grazing and Holistic Management methods in particular, are environmentally unsound. Context: Alan Savory ad...") |
Greg.Fuller (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Staging for Fact Sheet: Grazing in general, and Alan Savory's regenerative grazing methods in particular, are environmentally unsound. | |
| − | + | In a Ted Talk in 2013, Alan Savory presented his view that regenerative grazing is a way to reverse climate change and reverse desertification. The talk went viral with 2.7 million views. https://youtu.be/vpTHi7O66pI | |
| − | + | A study led by Oxford and published by the Food Climate Research Group (FCRN), disputed the claims made for regenerative grazing, saying "The actual evidence is thin on the ground and contradictory." and "scientific studies in support of Savory’s approach are scanty. Such evidence as exists is generally anecdotal, based on surveys and testimonies rather than on-site measurements." | |
https://www.fcrn.org.uk/sites/default/files/project-files/fcrn_gnc_report.pdf | https://www.fcrn.org.uk/sites/default/files/project-files/fcrn_gnc_report.pdf | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
A review published in the Agricultural Systems concludes that "the vast majority of experimental evidence does not support claims of enhanced ecological benefits in IRG compared to other grazing strategies, including the capacity to increase storage of soil organic carbon." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.001 | A review published in the Agricultural Systems concludes that "the vast majority of experimental evidence does not support claims of enhanced ecological benefits in IRG compared to other grazing strategies, including the capacity to increase storage of soil organic carbon." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.001 | ||
| − | + | An article in The Guardian which cites other sources showing why Savory's claims are false and misleading, reports that when asked for scientific support, Savory referenced a report on his own website containing "no references, no data and no links to any experimental or empirical research." https://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2014/aug/04/eat-more-meat-and-save-the-world-the-latest-implausible-farming-miracle | |
| − | + | Perhaps an article in The Wildlife News says it best: "Holistic grazing guru pieces together false assumptions to produce ineffective but popular recommendations on climate change." | |
http://www.thewildlifenews.com/2013/03/18/alan-savory-gives-a-popular-and-very-misleading-ted-talk/ | http://www.thewildlifenews.com/2013/03/18/alan-savory-gives-a-popular-and-very-misleading-ted-talk/ | ||
Revision as of 12:13, 7 February 2019
Staging for Fact Sheet: Grazing in general, and Alan Savory's regenerative grazing methods in particular, are environmentally unsound.
In a Ted Talk in 2013, Alan Savory presented his view that regenerative grazing is a way to reverse climate change and reverse desertification. The talk went viral with 2.7 million views. https://youtu.be/vpTHi7O66pI
A study led by Oxford and published by the Food Climate Research Group (FCRN), disputed the claims made for regenerative grazing, saying "The actual evidence is thin on the ground and contradictory." and "scientific studies in support of Savory’s approach are scanty. Such evidence as exists is generally anecdotal, based on surveys and testimonies rather than on-site measurements." https://www.fcrn.org.uk/sites/default/files/project-files/fcrn_gnc_report.pdf
According to George Monbiot, "Then there was a major study conducted, reviewing 300 papers on this subject, to see whether his claims, such as his holistic ranching could suck all the industrial carbon out of the atmosphere, whether that stood up. They found there is simply no evidence for such claims at all, that they are wildly wrong. And unfortunately, those claims, because they’re highly attractive to people, because they create the impression that you can eat meat and save the world, are simply not based on fact." https://www.democracynow.org/2018/11/29/george_monbiot_ending_meat_dairy_consumption
A paper published in the International Journal of Biodiversity in 2014 titled "Holistic Management: Misinformation on the Science of Grazed Ecosystems" concludes that none of the claims of Holistic Management hold up to scientific scrutiny. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/163431
A review published in the Agricultural Systems concludes that "the vast majority of experimental evidence does not support claims of enhanced ecological benefits in IRG compared to other grazing strategies, including the capacity to increase storage of soil organic carbon." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.001
An article in The Guardian which cites other sources showing why Savory's claims are false and misleading, reports that when asked for scientific support, Savory referenced a report on his own website containing "no references, no data and no links to any experimental or empirical research." https://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2014/aug/04/eat-more-meat-and-save-the-world-the-latest-implausible-farming-miracle
Perhaps an article in The Wildlife News says it best: "Holistic grazing guru pieces together false assumptions to produce ineffective but popular recommendations on climate change." http://www.thewildlifenews.com/2013/03/18/alan-savory-gives-a-popular-and-very-misleading-ted-talk/
