Assignment:Vegan Diets
This assignment is a work in process and not ready to be assigned. Assignments are moved to the draft namespace after an author has accepted the assignment.
<-- Visible editorial notes appear between <-- and --> tags. You can delete them after you start on a section or you can hide them by using the standard notation for comments, adding an exclamation mark: "<!-- note goes here -->." They should be deleted, hidden or not, before the pre-publication review. The author should delete this particular one after reading it. -->
Introduction
A vegan diet is one in which no animal products are consumed. While those embracing veganism are consequentially on a vegan diet, a vegan diet is not synonymous with veganism, which is more generally a way of living that avoids the exploitation of animals as far as possible and practicable. Also, the phrase vegan diet refers to a dietary pattern, and not a programmatic diet such as the South Beach Diet.
Types of Vegan Diets
Vegan diets vary greatly, and those following a vegan diet usually do not adhere strictly to one of the categories of the vegan diet discussed below. Also, most of the pertinent research regarding diets does not distinguish between the categories. Still, these categories are useful for discussion.
Whole-Food Plant-Based
Raw Diet
Junk Food Vegan Diet
Others
While the categories above may be thought of as general patterns, there are other vegan diets that are more prescriptive, such as the 90/10/10 Diet, the Starch Solutions Diet, and the Thrive Diet.
Scientific Consensus
There are no governing bodies that vote on a give scientific position that would declare the position to reach the level of scientific consensus. However, a strong argument could be made, and is made below, that there exists a scientific consensus that a vegan diet is not only adequate for good health, but also nutritionally advantageous over other dietary patterns. This is because scientists specializing in the field of nutrition generally agree.
Scientific consensus is a position "generally agreed upon at a given time by most scientists specialized in a given field". It does not represent unanimity, as some scientists in the field may disagree. Neither is it definitive, as the consensus could change with further research.[1]
<-- Discuss. Appeals to expertise are ok. As summarized as possible, invoke the words of Harvard Public Health, Cleveland Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Kaiser Permanente, but more importantly, and the Dietetic Associations of US, Canada, Great Britian, and Australia to show vegan diets go beyond adequate and are advantageous. It's good to mention specific diseases these organizations mention, but save the details on each for the next section.
Similar treatments on this site (not to be used as references in the completed article because this article is more specific, not the other way around) Delete these after reviewing: [2] [3]
-->
,
Specific Advantages
Supplementation
Objections
See Also
Footnotes
- ↑ “Glossary: Scientific Consensus,” accessed October 2, 2019, http://www.greenfacts.org/glossary/abc/consensus.htm.
- ↑ https://justiceforanimals.org/In_reply_to:_We_need_animal_products_to_be_healthy#Talking_Points
- ↑ https://justiceforanimals.org/In_reply_to:_Humans_are_natural_omnivores;_we_digest_meat,_have_canine_teeth,_and_have_front-facing_eyes#The_case_for_veganism_does_not_depend_on_humans_being_natural_herbivores_or_having_specific_physical_traits.
Meta
This article was originally authored by ???. The contents may have been edited since that time by others.
<--Other Editorial Notes
- What have I left out? * Does there need to be additional sections, or maybe another structure is better; this is not written in stone—ping your editor. * -->
