To get updates on new site content, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

JFA Wiki:About

From JFA Wiki
Revision as of 15:03, 13 August 2019 by Greg.Fuller (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{jfa-top}} == Your Animal Rights and Vegan Wiki == The Justice For Animals Wiki is an encyclopedic, collaboratively developed resource useful for animal rights and vegan...")

(diff) ← Older revision | Approved revision (diff) | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Your Animal Rights and Vegan Wiki

The Justice For Animals Wiki is an encyclopedic, collaboratively developed resource useful for animal rights and vegan advocacy, as well as for living vegan. We already offer useful content, but we are just getting started.

We use the same software platform as Wikipedia, but unlike Wikipedia, all articles are written in the context of animal rights and veganism, with an emphasis on information that is useful for advocacy and for living vegan.

Like Wikipedia, we place importance on supplying creditable sources for factual statements that are not general knowledge.

And also like Wikipedia, users can write new content and edit existing content. See Writing and Editing for the JFA Wiki.

Information

The information on this site is usefully organized, evidence-based, and non-hyperbolic.

Usefully organized

The site is organized into the kinds of information we use in advocacy—basic information, objections to veganism, facts to back up assertions, and summaries of various kinds. This way of organizing also engenders discovery and learning.

The further division of information in each section into the topics of animals, ethics, earth, health, and humanity provides a uniform structure to help you get to the information in which you are interested. Written definitions of these categories are forthcoming.

Evidence based

When we present a piece of information as fact, that information should be based on credible supporting evidence, not conjecture or unsubstantiated claims. We provide citations or links to credible sources for factual statements that are not general knowledge. We minimize using animal rights organizations for sources in cases where believability would be an issue to a non-vegan audience but not because the information is inaccurate.

Non-hyperbolic

Hyperbole and sensationalism are not welcome here. The case for animal rights and veganism is strong, and the objections are weak. There is no need to exaggerate.

In talking about the cruelties inflicted on animals, presenting the reality of what's happening may seem to be an exaggeration when it is not. It's especially important that when we make claims that may seem hyperbolic but in fact are not, that we are able to back up those claims with supporting evidence.